How should we interpret the biblical passages that seem to point to universalism (everyone ultimately being saved)? And is it true that Christian Apologetics depend on rationalism? Listen live here 2-4 pm EST, and call into the show at (866) 348 7884 with your questions and comments.
Hour 1:
Dr. Brown’s Bottom Line: God is not some impersonal force, matter, or energy. God is the personal creator of the universe and He made us to know Him. Outside of Him there is no true life.
Hour 2:
Dr. Brown’s Bottom Line: If there is breath and life there is still hope. Don’t write someone else off as hopeless. If God is still giving them life, there’s time for them to repent.
SPECIAL OFFER! THIS WEEK ONLY!
Get Your Copy of the CD from FIRE School of Ministry
“By Life or By Death: Songs of the Revolution”
For a Gift of ANY Size Postage Paid!
Call 1-800-278-9978 or order online!
Other Resources:
In the first fifteen minutes of this show,Michael answers a question from someone who left a local flock because of ‘hyper grace’ teaching ; a teacher that sweeps Gehenna under the rug.
Thing is,the lipe of Anne T. Nomian drip with sin-friendly honey.
Michael recently read one of the finest books on Gehenna you’re ever likely to find : ‘The Road To Hell’ by David Pawson.
Watch this 8 minute video advert for the book,in which David discusses the eyebrow-raising story of how David recovered the manuscript.
http://davidpawson.org/resources/resource/1206
Then follow Michael’s lead,and get a copy of the book for yourself :
http://www.amazon.com/The-Road-to-Hell-ebook/dp/B004W4M6LQ/ref=cm_cr-mr-img
Lisa was given a classic subsequence-Pentecostal answer during roughly the 25th and 35th minute of the show,in which baptism in the Holy Spirit was said to be for ’empowerment for service’ and ‘nothing to do with salvation.’
Man oh man ; Michael,thankyou for reading the Gehenna book – that was nice news indeed ; but please,do read this book very VERY soon.
http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Baptises-Holy-Spirit-ebook/dp/B00514II68/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1351520615&sr=1-1&keywords=baptises+pawson
Dr. Brown,
My question relates to Ezekiel and the future temple sacrifices and such. I have read the commentary by Ralph Alexander (same volume as your commentary on Jeremiah) and understand his argument that such sacrifices represent a memorial for Israel, much as the Lord’s supper represents a memorial of Jesus (neither memorial in themselves having atoning power), but what about the circumcision and keeping Sabbaths. Ezekiel 44:24 seems to indicate a return to a strict Sabbath keeping system and Ezekiel 44:9 indicates that circumcision comes back. Alexander seems to say that there will exist in the millennium period two systems of commemoration, and that gentile and Jew would both be free to participate in either. But according to Ezekiel 44:9 only those circumcised in BOTH FLESH and heart may approach the new temple. Does this not fly in the face of Paul’s teaching about circumcision? Further, it seems problematic to say that there will be a new covenant that is unlike and replaces the old covenant and yet still practice what has passed away.
Thanks for your time.
I was recommended this website by my cousin. I am not sure whetherthis post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my difficulty.You are incredible! Thanks!